Re: [RFC, PATCH 4/6] jbd: refactor nested journal log recoveryloop into separate functions

From: Jan Kara
Date: Wed Mar 12 2008 - 06:50:42 EST


On Wed 12-03-08 01:02:05, Duane Griffin wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 03:35:50PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> > Hmm, if I read your patch correctly, previously we aborted journal
> > replay when we found a block with unknown block magic but now we
> > continue replaying. Why have you done such change? And similarly when
> > some error happened when parsing revoke records block...
>
> You are right, that was an error on my part. Thanks for your careful
> review. Please find below an incremental patch. I'll roll this into the
> main patch before posting the next version.
Yup, looks fine.

Honza
>
> Cheers,
> Duane.
>
> --
> "I never could learn to drink that blood and call it wine" - Bob Dylan
>
> diff --git a/fs/jbd/recovery.c b/fs/jbd/recovery.c
> index 453c5fe..34db55a 100644
> --- a/fs/jbd/recovery.c
> +++ b/fs/jbd/recovery.c
> @@ -673,16 +673,22 @@ static int do_one_pass(journal_t *journal,
> case JFS_REVOKE_BLOCK:
> /* If we aren't in the REVOKE pass, then we can
> * just skip over this block. */
> - if (pass == PASS_REVOKE) {
> - err = scan_revoke_records(
> - journal, bh, next_commit_ID, info);
> + if (pass != PASS_REVOKE)
> + break;
> +
> + err = scan_revoke_records(journal, bh,
> + next_commit_ID, info);
> + if (err) {
> + brelse(bh);
> + goto failed;
> }
> break;
>
> default:
> jbd_debug(3, "Unrecognised magic %d, end of scan.\n",
> blocktype);
> - break;
> + brelse(bh);
> + goto done;
> }
>
> brelse(bh);
> @@ -695,6 +701,7 @@ static int do_one_pass(journal_t *journal,
> goto failed;
> }
>
> +done:
> /*
> * We broke out of the log scan loop: either we came to the
> * known end of the log or we found an unexpected block in the
--
Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/