[PATCH ver3] isd200: Allocate sense_buffer for hacked up scsi_cmnd

[Boaz Harrosh]

Since the separation of sense_buffer from scsi_cmnd, Drivers that hack their
own struct scsi_cmnd like here isd200, must also take care of their own
sense_buffer.

Signed-off-by: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/usb/storage/isd200.c |    5 ++++-
 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/usb/storage/isd200.c b/drivers/usb/storage/isd200.c
index 4f2d143..971d13d 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/storage/isd200.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/storage/isd200.c
@@ -1470,6 +1470,7 @@ static void isd200_free_info_ptrs(void *info_)
 	if (info) {
 		kfree(info->id);
 		kfree(info->RegsBuf);
+		kfree(info->srb.sense_buffer);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -1495,7 +1496,9 @@ static int isd200_init_info(struct us_data *us)
 				kzalloc(sizeof(struct hd_driveid), GFP_KERNEL);
 		info->RegsBuf = (unsigned char *)
 				kmalloc(sizeof(info->ATARegs), GFP_KERNEL);
-		if (!info->id || !info->RegsBuf) {
+		info->srb.sense_buffer =
+				kmalloc(SCSI_SENSE_BUFFERSIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
+		if (!info->id || !info->RegsBuf || !info->srb.sense_buffer) {
 			isd200_free_info_ptrs(info);
 			kfree(info);
 			retStatus = ISD200_ERROR;
-- 
1.5.3.3


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/