Re: [ANNOUNCE] Ramback: faster than a speeding bullet

[Daniel Phillips]

On Thursday 13 March 2008 13:34, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 00:17:56 -0800
> Daniel Phillips <phillips@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > So we have a flock of people arguing that you can't trust Linux.  Well
> > maybe there are situations were you can't, but what can you trust?
> > Disk firmware?  Bios?  Big maybes everywhere.
> 
> The traditional and proven method to constructing a reliable system is
> to assume that no component can be fully trusted.  This is especially
> true for new code.
> 
> By being paranoid about everything, failures in one component are
> usually contained well enough that one failure is not catastrophic.
> 
> In order for ramback to get appeal with the people who are paranoid
> about data integrity (probably a vast majority of users), you will
> need some guarantees about flush order, etc...

I disagree.  Never mind that it already does provide such guarantees,
just echo 1 >/proc/driver/ramback/name.  But if you want the full
performance you need to satisfy your paranoia at a higher level in
the traditional way: by running two in parallel or whatever.

Daniel 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/