Re: [RFC] cgroups: implement device whitelist lsm (v2)

From: Serge E. Hallyn
Date: Fri Mar 14 2008 - 10:42:23 EST


Quoting Paul Menage (menage@xxxxxxxxxx):
> On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 6:58 AM, Serge E. Hallyn <serue@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > James and Stephen agree with your LSM qualms. I suppose we could add
> > cgroups next to the lsm hooks. I suspect Paul Menage would complain
> > about that (Paul?),
>
> Depends on what you mean by "add cgroups to the LSM hooks". Could you
> expand on that?

cgroup hooks next to the lsm hooks. So in fs/namei.c where there are
security_inode_permission() hooks, there would also be
cgroup_inode_permission() hooks to let the devices cgroup mediate the
access. Well, in permission(), probably not in exec_permission_lite()
since that's probalby not a device access :)

So far it looks like everyone likes that, so as long as you don't nack I
guess that'll be the way to go.

thanks,
-serge
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/