Re: Audit vs netlink interaction problem

[Thomas Graf]

* Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@xxxxxxxxxx> 2008-03-14 20:05
> Hmmm... I'm afraid, that this can break the audit filtering and signal
> auditing. I haven't yet looked deep into it, but it compares the 
> task->tgid with this audit_pid for different purposes. If audit_pid
> changes this code will be broken.

OK, then both pids have to be stored. audit_pid remains as-is but is
no longer used as destination netlink pid. A second pid is stored and
updated whenever a netlink message is received from userspace.

> Bu we have no the netlink socket at the moment of setting the pid to
> check this. The audit_reveive_msg() call which does this set is received 
> via another (pre-created global) socket.

I don't understand this. As far as I can read the code, a plain kernel
side netlink socket is created in audit_init(). But it doesn't matter,
as soon as we receive the first message from userspace, we know the
netlink source pid.

> I though, that proper behavior would be to split audit_pid, used for
> filtering from the audit_nlk_pid used for netlink communications.

Yes, exactly.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/