Re: fix aperture vs. suspend problem

[Pavel Machek]

On Fri 2008-03-14 09:14:23, Romano Giannetti wrote:
> 
> 
> On Thu, 2008-03-13 at 23:38 +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > On Thu 2008-03-13 15:32:48, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > [...] 
> > > This is also needed in 2.6.24, perhaps earlier?
> > 
> > It seems to only trigger on >3GB boxes, during swsusp. People are not
> > normally suspending those big boxes. I do not think this is worth
> > backporting.
> 
> Here vendors are starting to sell x86_64 laptops with 4GB ram in the
> *default* configuration --- so I think that yes, it should be
> backported, at least to 2.6.24 (which will be heavily shipped by distros
> this year, I suppose).

Ok, if you hit the problem, you can do the backport. Subject is wrong,
it hits hibernation, not suspend (sorry), and I'm not yet sure if I
fixed all the related problems. Testing welcome.
									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
pomozte zachranit klanovicky les:  http://www.ujezdskystrom.info/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/