Re: use of preempt_count instead of in_atomic() at leds-gpio.c

From: David Brownell
Date: Tue Mar 25 2008 - 19:20:53 EST


I _almost_ hate bringing this lovely flamage back onto $SUBJECT ... but
what's the resolution for the leds-gpio.c issue? I've not seen a merge
notice for the patch I submitted a week ago now:

http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=120597839009399&w=2

Just a "leaning..." comment:

http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=120606104619198&w=2

Seems to me that by now there ought to be resolution on at least
one of the issues brought up on this thread. :)

- Dave

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/