Re: 100% C0 with 2.6.25-rc

[Len Brown]

applied.

thanks,
-len

On Friday 29 February 2008, Venki Pallipadi wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 09:03:55AM -0800, Pallipadi, Venkatesh wrote:
> >  
> > 
> > >-----Original Message-----
> > >From: Jan Willies [mailto:jan@xxxxxxxxxxxx] 
> > >Sent: Friday, February 22, 2008 7:56 AM
> > >To: Rafael J. Wysocki
> > >Cc: linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Ingo Molnar; LKML; Thomas 
> > >Gleixner; Pallipadi, Venkatesh
> > >Subject: Re: 100% C0 with 2.6.25-rc
> > >
> > >Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > >> On Thursday, 21 of February 2008, Jan Willies wrote:
> > >>> Since 2.6.25-rc1 I have a lot of wakeups/s (â134191,4) and 
> > >spend 100% in C0.
> > >>> It worked fine with 2.6.24 and commandline nolapic. Without 
> > >nolapic I had 80k
> > >>> wakeups/s after some time, but not right from the start like now.  
> > >> 
> > >> We have a regression from 2.6.24, apparently interrupts-related.
> > >
> > >After a lot of bisecting I've found the bad commit: 
> > >
> > >9b12e18cdc1553de62d931e73443c806347cd974 is first bad commit
> > >commit 9b12e18cdc1553de62d931e73443c806347cd974
> > >Author: venkatesh.pallipadi@xxxxxxxxx <venkatesh.pallipadi@xxxxxxxxx>
> > >Date:   Thu Jan 31 17:35:05 2008 -0800
> > >
> > >    ACPI: cpuidle: Support C1 idle time accounting
> > >    
> > >    Show C1 idle time in /sysfs cpuidle interface. C1 idle time may not
> > >    be entirely accurate in all cases. It includes the time spent
> > >    in the interrupt handler after wakeup with "hlt" based C1. 
> > >But, it will
> > >    be accurate with "mwait" based C1.
> > >
> > >
> > >Reverting the commit brings my laptop back to C2.
> > >
> > 
> > Thanks for the bisect info. I will look at the bad side effects that patch
> > may be having and I should have a patch for you to test later today....
> > 
> 
> Jan replied later on this issue that he is not able to reproduce this problem
> any more. Looking at the above, I could see a potential problem where
> menu governor may get confused by the C-state residency time from poll
> idle or C1 idle, where this timing info is not accurate. This inaccuracy is
> due to interrupts being handled before we account for C-state exit.
> 
> Patch below fixes this and is needed regardless of the issue pointed out by
> Jan Willies here. But, I am suspecting that the patch will also fix the
> problem reported by Jan.
> 
> Do not mark TIME_VALID for CO poll state.
> Mark C1 time as valid only with mwait (CSTATE_FFH) entry method.
> 
> This makes governors use the timing information only when it is correct and
> eliminates any wrong policy decisions that may result from invalid timing
> information.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Index: linux-2.6.git/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.git.orig/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c	2008-02-15 02:18:14.000000000 -0800
> +++ linux-2.6.git/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c	2008-02-26 07:02:30.000000000 -0800
> @@ -1686,7 +1686,9 @@
>  		switch (cx->type) {
>  			case ACPI_STATE_C1:
>  			state->flags |= CPUIDLE_FLAG_SHALLOW;
> -			state->flags |= CPUIDLE_FLAG_TIME_VALID;
> +			if (cx->entry_method == ACPI_CSTATE_FFH)
> +				state->flags |= CPUIDLE_FLAG_TIME_VALID;
> +
>  			state->enter = acpi_idle_enter_c1;
>  			dev->safe_state = state;
>  			break;
> Index: linux-2.6.git/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.git.orig/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c	2008-02-15 02:18:14.000000000 -0800
> +++ linux-2.6.git/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c	2008-02-22 03:59:01.000000000 -0800
> @@ -224,7 +224,7 @@
>  	state->exit_latency = 0;
>  	state->target_residency = 0;
>  	state->power_usage = -1;
> -	state->flags = CPUIDLE_FLAG_POLL | CPUIDLE_FLAG_TIME_VALID;
> +	state->flags = CPUIDLE_FLAG_POLL;
>  	state->enter = poll_idle;
>  }
>  #else
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/