Re: [RFC PATCH] UBIFS - new flash file system

[Artem Bityutskiy]

JÃrn Engel wrote:
> > 3. logfs does not seem to have bad-block handling.
>
> Bad blocks at mkfs time are handled, blocks turning bad later on aren't
> yet.

I personally refuse to compare a finished FS with handles all the
crucial flash features to a non-finished FS. It just makes no sense.

LogFS was talked about back 2005 in Linux Kongress [1], but is not
finished yet. Let's talk about it when it is production ready.

[1]. http://www.linux-kongress.org/2005/abstracts.html#4_4_2

--
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (ÐÑÑÑÐ ÐÐÑÑÑÐÐÐ)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/