Re: [PATCH] Fix tosakbd suspend

[Dmitry]

Hi, Dmitry,

2008/4/1, Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx>:
> Hi Dmitry,
>
>
>  On Tue, Apr 01, 2008 at 01:38:01AM +0400, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>  > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dbaryshkov@xxxxxxxxx>
>  > ---
>  >  drivers/input/keyboard/tosakbd.c |    3 +++
>  >  1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>  >
>  > diff --git a/drivers/input/keyboard/tosakbd.c b/drivers/input/keyboard/tosakbd.c
>  > index 3884d1e..306cbe8 100644
>  > --- a/drivers/input/keyboard/tosakbd.c
>  > +++ b/drivers/input/keyboard/tosakbd.c
>  > @@ -210,6 +210,9 @@ static int tosakbd_suspend(struct platform_device *dev, pm_message_t state)
>  >
>  >       del_timer_sync(&tosakbd->timer);
>  >
>
>
> What if interrupt comes here? The whole suspend path seems racy with
>  interrup handler/timer.

What is the best way to fix it? Moving from suspend to suspend_late
seems to be a hack.
Should I call a bunch of disable_irq or just introduce an atomic flag?

>
>
>  > +     PGSR1 = (PGSR1 & ~TOSA_GPIO_LOW_STROBE_BIT);
>  > +     PGSR2 = (PGSR2 & ~TOSA_GPIO_HIGH_STROBE_BIT);
>  > +
>  >       return 0;
>  >  }
>  >
>
>  --
>
> Dmitry
>


-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/