Re: [PATCH 2/4] set_restore_sigmask TIF_SIGPENDING

[Oleg Nesterov]

On 04/09, David Woodhouse wrote:
>
> One of the supposed advantages of TIF_RESTORE_SIGMASK in the first
> place, iirc, was that it allowed us to return a result code other than
> -EINTR as _well_ as restoring the signal mask.

Agreed, good point. ERESTART_ is not that flexible.

Somehow I assumed we will never need something "special" here, this is
not very clever.

Thanks to all!

Oleg.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/