Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix

[Jeff Garzik]

Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Jeff Garzik <jeff@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > > We've got three thousand Kconfig options - it is clearly not 
> > > realistic for users to keep such details in mind to avoid pitfalls.
> > Agreed -- hence the multiple announcements, including in this thread, 
> > to put said details into mind.
>
> which part of "it took a kernel developer more than an hour to figure 
> out why his laptop had a dead network interface" did you not understand? 
> Whatever you did, it was not apparent to me. I dont follow every tiny 
> detail of the e1000 driver family, nor do 99%+ [*] of our users.

You do follow LKML, where multiple announcements have and are being posted.

	Jeff



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/