Re: [PATCH] arch/arm/Kconfig: Make UIO available on ARM architecture

[Uwe Kleine-König]

Hi Russell,

Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 02:21:27PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > Hello,
> > 
> > Hans-Jürgen Koch wrote:
> > > Am Thu, 7 Feb 2008 14:12:36 +0100
> > > schrieb Hans-Jürgen Koch <hjk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> > > 
> > > AFAICT, this patch was neither rejected nor applied. It generated a
> > > long thread about changing the whole ARM Kconfig system. I feel not
> > > qualified to do that, but I still want UIO available on ARM ;-)
> > > What can I do to help?
> > Anything new here?
> > 
> > In my eyes this can be sent to the patch system.
> 
> I don't remember anything about this...
I don't know how I should understand your statement.  Does this only
comment on my suggestion to send it to the patch system or on the patch
itself?

After Hans-Jürgen addressed your concerns about the order in
arch/arm/Kconfig compared to drivers/Kconfig there was no addional
feedback (apart from the discussion about including drivers/Kconfig in
arch/arm/Kconfig).

I consider the patch good until arch/arm/Kconfig includes
drivers/Kconfig (if ever).

As it is a while that the discussion took place, here is the thread in
the archive:

	http://lists.arm.linux.org.uk/lurker/thread/20080207.125824.348cd1bd.en.html

and the following post includes the last version of the patch:

	http://lists.arm.linux.org.uk/lurker/message/20080207.131236.8c4f4569.en.html

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Uwe Kleine-König, Software Engineer
Digi International GmbH Branch Breisach, Küferstrasse 8, 79206 Breisach, Germany
Tax: 315/5781/0242 / VAT: DE153662976 / Reg. Amtsgericht Dortmund HRB 13962
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/