Re: file offset corruption on 32-bit machines?

[Jan Kara]

> On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 04:31:09PM +0200, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> > >   Well, this race is more subtle - the window is just one instruction
> > > wide (stores to f_pos from CPU2 must come between the store of lower and
> > > upper 32-bits of f_pos on CPU1). And the only result is that f_pos has
> > > 32-bits from one file pointer and 32-bits from the other one. So I can
> > > hardly imagine this would be exploitable...
> > 
> > Supposing you are not holding any spinlock and are running with 
> > preemptible kernel (pretty common scenario nowadays), there is nothing 
> > that would prevent kernel from rescheduling between the two instructions, 
> > enlarging the race window to be more comfortable for attacker, right?
> > 
> > I think this is worth fixing.
> 
> Seems a lot like reading jiffies to me.  Is the seqlock the right
> solution to use for fixing this?
  You can get your inspiration in the implementation of i_size_read()
and i_size_write() functions :). They deal with exactly the same problem.
But in the case of f_pos, the number of readers and writers is balanced so
maybe a spinlock would be fine as well...

								Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
SuSE CR Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/