Re: [PATCH 0/3] x86: add cpus_scnprintf function v3

[Paul Jackson]

Bert wrote:
> My statement from above doesn't reflect my opinion. I'm still in
> flavor with the mask output. And from this discussion, I found a new
> point for the mask output: its bounded ;-)

Ok

> I just wanted to note, that these new list attributes would be the
> only way to 'change' the api, ie. introduce a new api and deprecate
> the old one, and not change the format of the present api.

Agreed

-- 
                  I won't rest till it's the best ...
                  Programmer, Linux Scalability
                  Paul Jackson <pj@xxxxxxx> 1.940.382.4214
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/