Re: [patch 16/17] Immediate Values - Documentation

[Mathieu Desnoyers]

* Rusty Russell (rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> On Thursday 10 April 2008 01:08:45 Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> > If you have to read the immediate values from a function declared as
> > __init or __exit, you should explicitly use _imv_read(), which will fall
> > back on a global variable read. Failing to do so will leave a reference to
> > the __init section after it is freed (it would generate a modpost
> > warning).
> 
> That's a real usability wart.  Couldn't we skip these in the patching loop if 
> required and revert so noone can make this mistake?
> 

Yeah, I know :(

Well, only if we can find a way to detect the macro is put within a init
or exit section. Is there some assembly trickery that would permit us to
do that ?

Otherwise, given the memory freed from the init section could be reused
later by the kernel, I don't see how we can detect the pointer leads to
a freed init section and, say, a module.

Mathieu

> Thanks,
> Rusty.

-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
Computer Engineering Ph.D. Student, Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal
OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F  BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/