On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 09:19:17AM -0400, Mark Lord (lkml@xxxxxx) wrote:..That's not demanding, that's quite relaxed. I had a good workaround,Or I can ignore it, like the net developers, since I have a workaround.
And then we'll see what other apps are broken upon 2.6.25 final release.
and didn't really care any more at that point. Just though it was rather
odd that none of the developers seemed interested in tracking it down.
I offered tons of help, gave it, and said I didn't have time for a full
bisect at that juncture.
For that, I get repeatedly slammed by the netdev folks.
Even after I put aside *paid* work to submit to your demands.
Next time around, I won't bother reporting bugs to you folks,
that's for damned sure.
Actually that will be the best decision from evolutional point of view.
Bugs, which 'are thrown back to your face' like what you did with this
one, are useless. Developers already know, that bugs exist.
If you do not care about bug, why do you ever bothered filling it?
If you do not want to help fixing it ...