Re: [PATCH] Replace completions with semaphores

[Roland Dreier]

 > Arnd contacted me off-list and made the very sensible suggestion of:
 > 
 > struct completion {
 > 	struct semaphore sem;
 > }
 > 
 > That lets us eliminate the duplicate code since all the completion
 > functions become very thin wrappers around semaphore operations.

Just make sure you don't forget the history of completions...  As
Linus said long ago (http://lwn.net/2001/0802/a/lt-completions.php3):

  In case anybody cares, the race was that Linux semaphores only protect the
  accesses _inside_ the semaphore, while the accesses by the semaphores
  themselves can "race" in the internal implementation. That helps make an
  efficient implementation, but it means that the race was:
  
            cpu #1                       cpu #2
  
            DECLARE_MUTEX_LOCKED(sem);
            ..
            down(&sem);                   up(&sem);
            return;
                                          wake_up(&sem.wait) /*BOOM*/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/