Re: [2.6 patch] mfd/sm501.c: #if 0 unused functions

From: Adrian Bunk
Date: Sun Apr 13 2008 - 15:25:29 EST


On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 09:08:31PM +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> On 13/04/2008, Adrian Bunk <bunk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 08:55:21PM +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> > > On 13/04/2008, Adrian Bunk <bunk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > This patch #if 0's the following unused functions:
> > > > - sm501_find_clock()
> > > > - sm501_gpio_get()
> > > > - sm501_gpio_set()
> > > >
> > >
> > > Hi Adrian,
> > >
> > > I know we've discussed this before, but I have to comment on this once more.
> > >
> > > Why is it that you seem to prefer adding '#if 0' around blocks of
> > > unused code instead of removing it outright?
> >
> > >...
> >
> > When I removed unused code outright some people complained that they
> > plan to use it tomorrow or in the next millenium or whenever.
> >
> > When I #if 0 it other people complain that I should remove it outright.
> >
> > So whatever I do, there's always someone complaining. ;-)
> >
> > In this case the code looks as if it might get used at some point in the
> > future.
> >
> > But if a maintainer tells me to resend a patch with the code removed
> > instead of #if 0'ed I'm always glad to do this.
> >
> But, you are completely ignoring the case of "the code is unused, but
> will probably be used soon, so I'll just leave it alone and avoid the
> churn". Why? What's the point of commenting it out now and then
> enabling it again in a month or two - isn't that just pointless churn?
>...

It's unused since more than one year, so chances are it won't get used
in a month or two.

As I said, if a maintainer wants me to remove it outright I'll be glad
to do so.

And as I said, no matter whatever I do, there's always someone
complaining...

cu
Adrian

--

"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/