Re: [PATCH 0/7] OMFS filesystem version 3
From: David Woodhouse
Date: Sun Apr 13 2008 - 17:16:20 EST
On Sun, 2008-04-13 at 12:37 +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> There's one thing which makes fuse a slightly better candidate for
> applications where the number of users is low: stability. Unless you
> or your users test the hell out of your filesystem, there always a
> chance that some bugs will remain. These rarely bring down the whole
> system, but it usually requires a reboot to let you continue using the
> Oopsing fs.
I think it's a slippery slope from that to rewriting Linux as a
microkernel.
Simple block filesystems like this belong in the kernel.
--
dwmw2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/