Re: [PATCH 1/2] Add thread_info_cache_init() to all archs

[Andrew Morton]

On Thu, 10 Apr 2008 13:22:56 +1000 Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Some architecture need to maintain a kmem cache for thread info
> structures. (next patch adds that to powerpc to fix an alignment
> problem).
> 
> There is no good arch callback to use to initialize that cache
> that I can find, so this adds a new one and adds an empty macro
> for when it's not implemented.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> 
> So we have the choice here between:
> 
>  - the ifdef on the func name that I did, consistent with what
> I did before for iomap, which iirc Linus liked
> 
>  - add some more ARCH_HAS_* or HAVE_* (yuck)
> 
>  - add an empty definition to all archs .h (pain in the neck but I
> can do it, though it will be an annoying patch to keep around)
> 
>  - do a weak function (will slightly bloat everybody for no good reason)
> 
> So unless there is strong complaints, I'd like to stick to my
> current approach.
> 
>  include/linux/sched.h |    4 ++++
>  init/main.c           |    1 +
>  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+)
> 
> --- linux-work.orig/init/main.c	2008-04-10 13:11:06.000000000 +1000
> +++ linux-work/init/main.c	2008-04-10 13:11:19.000000000 +1000
> @@ -623,6 +623,7 @@ asmlinkage void __init start_kernel(void
>  	if (efi_enabled)
>  		efi_enter_virtual_mode();
>  #endif
> +	thread_info_cache_init();
>  	fork_init(num_physpages);
>  	proc_caches_init();
>  	buffer_init();
> Index: linux-work/include/linux/sched.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-work.orig/include/linux/sched.h	2008-04-10 13:11:44.000000000 +1000
> +++ linux-work/include/linux/sched.h	2008-04-10 13:12:05.000000000 +1000
> @@ -1893,6 +1893,10 @@ static inline unsigned long *end_of_stac
>  
>  #endif
>  
> +#ifndef thread_info_cache_init
> +#define thread_info_cache_init	do { } while(0)
> +#endif

This trick does cause a bit of a problem: it is undefined which arch header
file is to provide the alternative definition of thread_info_cache_init.

So we can (and have) ended up in the situation where the override appears
in different files on different architectures and various screwups ensue.

So I'd suggest that we have a bigfatcomment telling implementors which file
the override should be implemented in.  And make sure that this arch file is
directly included from within sched.h.

I have a suspicion that we can still get in a mess if .c files include the
per-arch file and don't include sched.h, but I forget where this happened
and why it broke stuff.

Sigh.  A nice, coded-in-C implementation within each and every architecture
remains the best implementation, and all the little tricks-to-save-typing
have failure modes.

otoh, if only one .c file will ever call this function then I think that
all problems are solved by

a) moving the above ifdeffery into the .c file
b) adding a comment explaining which arch file must provide the override
c) directly including that file from within the .c file.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/