Re: [PATCH 1/3] PM: Introduce new top level suspend andhibernation callbacks (rev. 8)

[Benjamin Herrenschmidt]

> Please have a look at this thread:
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/3/21/322
> (in short, the reporter sees APM suspend breakage under stress, occuring
> because APM uses our suspending of devices without the freezer).
> 
> It mostly appears to work without the freezer, but that's bacuse no one
> actually does things that might break it.  I don't think we can rely on users
> being so kind to us forever. :-)

As far as I'm concerned, it's yet another case of the freezer papering
over a problem rather than fixing it properly.

If we're going to introduce new callbacks, we should have the right
semantic from day 1 -and- fix those problems, rather than going to the
same old recursive nonsensical arguments and do things to paper over
problems.

Ben.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/