Re: [patch] F_GETPATH for linux

From: Davide Libenzi
Date: Mon Apr 14 2008 - 13:35:19 EST


On Mon, 14 Apr 2008, Christoph Hellwig wrote:

> On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 03:00:53PM -0700, Davide Libenzi wrote:
> > I was working on some bsd/linux compatibility code, and I noticed that we
> > do not have F_GETPATH. I know we can readlink /proc/PID/fd/FD (that is
> > what I'm doing now, under #ifdef), but I gave a patch a shot anyway.
> > Here it is, building but untested ...
>
> Adding a duplicated API like this is rather pointless. Especially as
> the readlink is easier and makes more sense.

As I said, we can do it in the other way. I struck this one when trying to
work out (read port) some BSD code to Linux. IMO, given that the patch
does virtually only add an F_GETPATH define in fcntl.h, and a case in the
fcntl switch, it may be worth considering.



- Davide


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/