Re: [Bug #10117] 2.6.25-current-git sometimes hangs on boot -dual-core Sony Vaio
From: Adrian Bunk
Date: Tue Apr 15 2008 - 16:46:21 EST
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 10:33:38PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, 15 of April 2008, Carlos R. Mafra wrote:
> > On Sun 13.Apr'08 at 17:25:45 -0300, Carlos R. Mafra wrote:
> > > On Sun 13.Apr'08 at 20:56:41 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > > > of recent regressions.
> > > >
> > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > > > from 2.6.24. Please verify if it still should be listed.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10117
> > > > Subject : 2.6.25-current-git sometimes hangs on boot - dual-core Sony Vaio
> > > > Submitter : Soeren Sonnenburg <kernel@xxxxxx>
> > > > Date : 2008-02-23 18:55 (51 days old)
> > > > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/23/263
> > > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/4/4/41
> > > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/4/9/69
> > >
> > > Soeren said it no longer happens to him in http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/4/9/53
> > > but unfortunately it still happens with me using -rc9. So I kidnapped his
> > > bugzilla report :-)
> > >
> > > In the bugzilla entry I said earlier today that "hpet=disable" apparently
> > > makes the problem go away (42 boots OK so far, whereas without this
> > > boot option it hangs ~90% using vga=6 and ~10% using vga=0x0364)
> > >
> > > I tried to bisect it, but sometimes in pre 2.6.25-rc1 kernels it takes
> > > 30 boots before the first hang to occur. So bisection is not reliable...
> > >
> > > If someone proposes a patch I will be glad to test it!
> > >
> > > PS: The similar bug in buzilla 10377 also appears to be "fixed"
> > > by using hpet=disable, see comment #17 in that bug.
> >
> >
> > From what Mark Lord said in his comments #33 to #35 in
> > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10117
> > it appears that this is a much older regression, from april 2007.
> >
> > So this is a regression, but not from 2.6.24 (although somehow
> > it never hit me before). I don't know about the policy of closing
> > regressions that come from way before the previous kernel version,
> > if there is any. Then I will let you manage the bugzilla #10117
> > as you see fit (but I will be "there" to hopefuly test any
> > proposed patches).
>
> I dropped the bug from the list of recent regressions, so it doesn't block
> bug #9832 any more. However, this still is a bug and regression, so the
> bugzilla entry remains open.
Soerens original report was a 2.6.25 regression.
And #10377 that was closed as a duplicate of #10117 was also reported as
a 2.6.25 regression.
#10117 seems to suffer from the common disease of people hijacking an
existing bug, but Soeren's issue that was what was originally tracked in
#10117 is (or was) a 2.6.25 regression.
If other people have similar problems that already existed in 2.6.24
these are different issues that should be tracked in their own bugs.
> Thanks,
> Rafael
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/