On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 13:51:37 +0300At the time I wrote it, it made sense (to me :)) but it's been such a long time ago I would not remember. Probably to show that this is something internal and needs to be used with caution.
"Vitaliy Ivanov" <vitalivanov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 1:42 PM, Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxx> wrote:I had trouble figuring out what the code does. atomic_inc/dec
management is actually pretty simple, but it is needlessly obfuscated
with macros. Fix that.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxxx>
I had trouble figuring out what the code does. atomic_inc/dec
management is actually pretty simple, but it is needlessly obfuscated
with macros. Fix that.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxxx>
Got it from the first time;)
Do you think that now code looks better? As for me it's not...
Yes, I expect that the original code was easier to work with and it is not
obfuscated I don't think. Sometimes these things take a few minutes for
new readers to become comfortable with but are good for people who work on
the code regularly.
Although it's a mystery why __pending_tx() and friends
a) have leading underscores and
I'm not sure what you mean ? #define vs inline I suppose ?
b) are implemented in cpp, when C is available.