Re: [PATCH] x86: fix find_next_bit breakage on ppc and powerpc

[Paul Mackerras]

Ingo Molnar writes:
> 
> * Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > Powerpc (and ppc) have their have some code in their bitops.h which 
> > used to be exacly the same as asm-generic/bitops/find.h. Include this 
> > header instead.
> > 
> > This should also fix the compile problems due to the generic 
> > find_next_bit changes. Those were fixed by Thomas Gleixner in 
> > asm-generic/bitops/find.h earlier.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> thanks, applied. I dropped:

Why are powerpc (and ppc) patches
- not being sent to the powerpc maintainer (me)
- not being cc'd to the linuxppc-dev@xxxxxxxxxx list
- ending up going through the x86 tree?

How come patches to unify x86_32 and x86_64 bitops need to end up
touching powerpc?

Paul.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/