Re: [v2.6.26] what's brewing in x86.git for v2.6.26
From: Pekka Enberg
Date: Thu Apr 17 2008 - 06:41:36 EST
Hi Andrew,
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 1:33 PM, Andrew Morton
<akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Thank you whoever wrote kmemcheck.txt
That would be Vegard.
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 1:33 PM, Andrew Morton
<akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> How come slub uses one byte to track the status of each byte when it could
> use a single bit?
Single bit is not enough as we track use after free as well (after
we've added delayed freeing to the beast).
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 1:33 PM, Andrew Morton
<akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> We (still!) have not made the decision whether to proceed with slab or
> slub. How hard would it be to port kmemcheck into slab?
Not hard.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/