Re: [PATCH 0/7] OMFS filesystem version 3

[Bob Copeland]

On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 10:23 AM, Miklos Szeredi <miklos@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>  Fuse has two different APIs.  For the "high level", path based one,
>  this is true.  The "low level" one is very similar to the one provided
>  by the VFS.

Ah nice, I do not know how I missed that.  Thanks for pointing that out.

>  And I think the VFS is great.  Undoubtedly kernel programming has it's
>  own charm, and I definitely don't want to scare you away from that.
>  Merging into mainline is a great reward, which must be erned the hard
>  way.  The debate is just part of that ;)
>
>  I also want to dispel any myths surrounding fuse, because those help
>  nobody.

Sure.  I'll go on record saying that omfs_fuse was written over a weekend and
can not be considered a good example of anything.  I already had a
proto-libomfs that I had made for omfsck and mkomfs, and wanted to see how
easy it would be to wire that stuff up into a FUSE fs.  Pretty easily, it
turned out.

-- 
Bob Copeland %% www.bobcopeland.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/