Re: [PATCH 01/15] ARM minor irq handler cleanups
From: Lennert Buytenhek
Date: Fri Apr 18 2008 - 19:54:23 EST
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 07:22:45PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Avoid confusion by /not/ passing an unused pointer to
> arm_rtc_interrupt()
Looks OK to me.
> This change's main purpose is to prepare for the patchset in
> jgarzik/misc-2.6.git#irq-remove, that explores removal of the
> never-used 'irq' argument in each interrupt handler.
What do you mean? I know at least one of two interrupt handlers
in-tree that use their 'irq' arguments.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/