Re: [PATCH 0/5] Clocklib: generic clocks framework

[Hiroshi DOYU]

Hi Dmitry,

From: "ext Dmitry" <dbaryshkov@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Clocklib: generic clocks framework
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 12:48:24 +0400

> >  - Hiroshi DOYU has proposed an alternate debugfs implementation for the
> >   Linux-OMAP clock tree.  I prefer it to yours, as it implements each
> >   clock as a separate dentry, which makes it easy to implement additional
> >   debugging functions, such as set_rate/set_parent/round_rate debugging.
> >   Perhaps you'd consider it, or something similar to it, instead?  It is
> >   proposed here:
> >      http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg00751.html
> 
> I'll look at this. However, if we are going to use such
> implementation, may we should
> move instead to sysfs?

This has been discussed within the above thread in omap and you can
find the sysfs implementation sysfs at the bottom of the following:

http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg00696.html

    Hiroshi DOYU
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/