Re: Voyager phys_cpu_present_map compile error

[H. Peter Anvin]

Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * H. Peter Anvin <hpa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > sure - but no need to be rude and mark it BROKEN when we've got this much 
> > > better tool named "email". BROKEN is really just for cases where there's 
> > > no-one willing to fix things.
> > I'm not trying to be rude, I'm just trying to avoid putting an 
> > unnecessary burden on testers and just let Kconfig know not to pick 
> > this particular random path.  Obviously, Kconfig doesn't care, but 
> > it's clear BROKEN has negative associations; besides, it really is 
> > unnecessarily strong.
> >
> > Perhaps what we need is NORAND?
>
> yep, i was thinking about CONFIG_BROKEN2 already :-)
>
> then i came up with: CONFIG_NON_GENERIC. All code that can break a 
> normal bootup should be marked with that. Such as CONFIG_ROOT_NFS=y 
> [panics on bootup] or CONFIG_EUROTECH_WDT=y [crashes on bootup] or 
> CONFIG_SND_MTPAV [hangs on bootup] and the dozens of other config 
> options i had to map when trying to bring up an allyesconfig kernel for 
> the first time ;-)
>
> auto-tests could then still build-test NON_GENERIC kernels but would not 
> attempt to boot them up.

Well, that's slightly different.  I don't think it's fair to impose even 
compile-testing Voyager on the entire x86 development community.

	-hpa

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/