Re: [PATCH] xfs: do not pass size into kmem_free, it's unused

[Eric Sandeen]

Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> Hi David,
> 
>> Patches are welcome - I'd be over the moon if any of the known 4k
>> stack advocates sent a stack reduction patch for XFS, but it seems
>> that actually trying to fix the problems is much harder than
>> resending a one line patch every few months....
> 
> kmem_free() function takes (ptr, size) arguments but doesn't
> actually use second one.
> 
> This patch removes size argument from all callsites.

I didn't expect it to but this does reduce a few things slightly.

On x86_64:

-xfs_attr_leaf_list_int 200
+xfs_attr_leaf_list_int 184

-xfs_dir2_sf_to_block 136
+xfs_dir2_sf_to_block 120

-xfs_ifree_cluster 136
+xfs_ifree_cluster 120

-xfs_inumbers 184
+xfs_inumbers 168

-xfs_mount_free 24

Thanks,
-Eric

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/