Re: [PATCH 03 of 12] get_task_mm should not succeed if mmput() isrunning and has reduced
From: Christoph Lameter
Date: Tue Apr 22 2008 - 19:13:30 EST
On Wed, 23 Apr 2008, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 01:23:16PM -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > Missing signoff by you.
>
> I thought I had to signoff if I conributed with anything that could
> resemble copyright? Given I only merged that patch, I can add an
> Acked-by if you like, but merging this in my patchset was already an
> implicit ack ;-).
No you have to include a signoff if the patch goes through your custody
chain. This one did.
Also add a
From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@xxxxxxx>
somewhere if you want to signify that the patch came from me.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/