[RFC PATCH 0/2] sched fixes for suboptimal balancing

From: Gregory Haskins
Date: Wed Apr 23 2008 - 07:46:42 EST

Next message: Gregory Haskins: "[PATCH 1/2] sched: fix RT task-wakeup logic"
Previous message: Konrad Rzeszutek: "Re: [2.6 patch] drivers/firmware/iscsi_ibft.c: make 3 functions static"
In reply to: Gregory Haskins: "Re: [PATCH 1/2] sched: push rt tasks only if newly activatedtasks have been added"
Next in thread: Gregory Haskins: "[PATCH 1/2] sched: fix RT task-wakeup logic"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hi Ingo,

Here are my proposed fixes for the issue Dmitry has highlighted in:

http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/4/22/296

This is an RFC, and it applies to sched-devel.

Regards,
-Greg
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Gregory Haskins: "[PATCH 1/2] sched: fix RT task-wakeup logic"
Previous message: Konrad Rzeszutek: "Re: [2.6 patch] drivers/firmware/iscsi_ibft.c: make 3 functions static"
In reply to: Gregory Haskins: "Re: [PATCH 1/2] sched: push rt tasks only if newly activatedtasks have been added"
Next in thread: Gregory Haskins: "[PATCH 1/2] sched: fix RT task-wakeup logic"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]