Re: [patch] softlockup: fix false positives on nohz if CPU is 100%idle for more than 60 seconds

[Ingo Molnar]

* David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > It may take some time, as each test run the verify the existence of 
> > the problem takes several minutes.
> 
> Ok, Ingo, none of your patches fix even the initial buggy changeset, 
> for reference:

as a temporary workaround please try the patch below, until we can 
reproduce and fix the bug.

	Ingo

------------------------------->
Subject: softlockup: nohz workaround
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed Apr 23 15:19:32 CEST 2008

Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
---
 kernel/softlockup.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Index: linux/kernel/softlockup.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/kernel/softlockup.c
+++ linux/kernel/softlockup.c
@@ -245,7 +245,7 @@ static int watchdog(void *__bind_cpu)
 	 */
 	while (!kthread_should_stop()) {
 		touch_softlockup_watchdog();
-		schedule();
+		schedule_timeout(softlockup_thresh/2);
 
 		if (kthread_should_stop())
 			break;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/