Re: [patch 00/37] Linux Kernel Markers instrumentation forsched-devel.git

[Ingo Molnar]

* Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Subject: sched: de-uglyfy marker impact

>  		rq = task_rq_lock(p, &flags);
> -		trace_mark(kernel_sched_wait_task, "pid %d state %ld",
> -			p->pid, p->state);
> +		trace_kernel_sched_wait(p);

that does look more compact and more maintainable indeed. (and should 
not impact tracers in any way - we still get the very same marker) Does 
this make scheduler markers more acceptable to you? If yes i'll queue 
this up.

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/