Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/5] must hold lock_super() to set initial mountwriter

[Dave Hansen]

On Wed, 2008-04-30 at 11:25 +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> > We need lock_mnt_writers() during a remount in order
> > to keep mnt->__mnt_writers from changing so that we
> > get a consistent look at if a sb currently has anyone
> > writing to it.
> > 
> > But, we need to lock writers out for an extended
> > period, even during the ->remount_fs() operation.
> > That's because we do conclusively make the fs
> > r/o until *after* the ->remount_fs().
> 
> So?  Why don't we mark the fs r/o _before_ calling ->remount_fs() and
> if that fails, just mark it r/w again.
> 
> OK, we'll deny writes in that interval, but I don't see that as a big
> problem.  And it would simplify the implementation considerably.

Personally, I think that's a bit messy.  People might start getting
-EROFS when they never, ever *HAD* a r/o FS.  They may have made a
request for one, but they never actually hard one.

I also understand what you're saying.  If we were able to loosen up some
of the requirements it would certainly make the patches simpler.  How
does everyone else feel about this?

-- Dave

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/