Re: [PATCH] Fix SMP alternatives : use mutex instead of spinlock,text_poke is sleepable

[Mathieu Desnoyers]

* Linus Torvalds (torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> 
> 
> On Thu, 1 May 2008, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> > 
> > Yep. I think using a mutex should fix it. There is no reason to use a
> > spinlock rather than a mutex here.
> 
> Is there any reason to do any locking what-so-ever?
> 
> If this code could possibly race with something else, that sounds like a 
> bug in itself, no?
> 
> 		Linus

The smp_alt mutex taken in
alternatives_smp_module_add/alternatives_smp_module_del seems required
because this code will run at module load/free, even in SMP context (not
within stop_machine_run).

As for alternatives_smp_switch, which is called when switching between
UP and SMP, always in UP context, I guess we should assume it could be
executed concurrently wrt the module_load/free, even in UP on a
CONFIG_PREEMPT kernel.

Mathieu


-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F  BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/