Re: huge gcc 4.1.{0,1} __weak problem

[Tom Rini]

On Thu, May 01, 2008 at 03:42:38PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:

[snip]
> Is there some vaguely maintainable workaround we can do?  If the problem
> only affects completely-empty weak functions then we could put something in
> them to make them non-empty?

My memory is a tiny bit hazy (it was a while ago), but no, it's not just
empty functions (again, I _think_ I hit it with a generic vs arch weak
function).

-- 
Tom Rini
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/