Re: [PATCH] fix checkstack.pl arch detection
From: Andrew Morton
Date: Fri May 02 2008 - 22:33:05 EST
On Fri, 02 May 2008 21:20:48 -0500 Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Sat, 3 May 2008 00:37:03 +0200
> > J__rn Engel <joern@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, 2 May 2008 12:20:53 -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> >>> uname -m was leaving a newline in $arch, and not passing the tests.
> >>>
> >>> Also, printing the unknown arch on failure is probably helpful.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Reviewed-By: Joern Engel <joern@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>
> >
> > please cc apw on checkpatch changes.
> >
> > This patch needs some help to merge against the forthcoming
> > checkpatch-0.19. I sent your patches apw-wards.
> >
>
> Um, checkpatch or checkstack? :)
>
bah.
hm, I wonder why one of them got a reject. `patch -l' was needed. Mailer
munchies, perhaps?
Please check that what I applied is still correct.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/