Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next

[Stephen Rothwell]

Hi Andrew,

On Fri, 2 May 2008 15:33:01 -0700 Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 02 May 2008 18:20:26 -0400
> Jeff Garzik <jeff@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > (Jeff, git-libata-all is a pretty important one)
> > 
> > libata-dev.git#NEXT is for linux-next, and libata-dev.git#ALL is for -mm
> > 
> > Already taken care of.
> 
> Oh.  Something seems to have gone wrong then.
> 
> Next/Trees has:
> 
> libata          git     git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/libata-dev.git#NEXT
> 
> but:
> 
> y:/usr/src/25> diffstat patches/linux-next.patch | grep /ata/      
> 
> There's nothing there?

This just means that everything that Jeff expected to go into 2.6.26 is
not in Linus' tree, right?  And he hasn't moved his 2.6.27 expectations
into linux-next yet (after all we are still in the 2.6.26 merge window).

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

Attachment: pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature