On Sat, 03 May 2008 03:19:00 +0200 Stefan Richter <stefanr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Andrew Morton wrote:On Fri, 2 May 2008 15:12:06 -0700What about the committer info? Well, I suppose a nobody@localhost slips in, but more often I expect it to be something more telling than that.
Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The firstdoh. I'm pulling linux-next's constituent trees independently, so if I
problem is working out "how the heck did that patch get into linux-next"? That would be much easier if the signoff trail was complete for git-based
patches, but it often is not.
spot a turd in linux-next I can just grep the various git trees to find out
where it came from.
It seems wrong though...
Beats me. To pick one example:
commit 1a72963d3af38eb17a939fc19b322735da1c0aad
Author: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@xxxxxx>
Date: Fri Apr 25 12:38:41 2008 -0400
Convert board-nokia770 from semaphore to spinlock
None of the operations done under the semaphore could sleep, so a spinlock
is more appropriate to this case.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
There's no sign how that got there. A bit of forensics shows up: