Offtopic to: LogFS merge

[David Collier-Brown]

Linus Torvalds wrote:
> The real issue for me wrt a filesystem is the on-disk layout.
>
> If we know that on-disk structures need change, we shouldn't merge it. It 
> doesn't matter if that can be worked around with some backwards- 
> compatibiltiy flag: we should simply not encourage that kind of behaviour.

 I agree in particular, but not in principle (;-))

 Changing the filesystem format was something that happened at
least twice on Multics, on production machines. I happened to be
on during one of the changes and didn't even know it was happening
until there was a broadcast message warning of poor performance.

 I always thought that was cool, and got permission recently to
post a colleague's paper on it at http://www.multicians.org/stachour.html

 It would be cool if data could change at run-time on Linux, just
like security-sensitive code.

--dave
--
David Collier-Brown            | Always do right. This will gratify
Sun Microsystems, Toronto      | some people and astonish the rest
davecb@xxxxxxx                 |                      -- Mark Twain
(905) 943-1983, cell: (647) 833-9377, (800) 555-9786 x56583
bridge: (877) 385-4099 code: 506 9191#
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/