Re: [PATCH 01/56] microblaze_v2: Kconfig patches

[Michal Simek]

> Hi Michal,
> 
> On Sun, 2008-05-04 at 13:40 +0200, monstr@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> 
>> +config EARLY_PRINTK_UARTLITE_ADDRESS
>> +	hex "Physical address where UART Lite for early printk is mapped"
>> +	depends on EARLY_PRINTK
>> +	default "0x40100000"
>> +	help
>> +	  Please enter physical address where your uart lite is mapped.
> 
> I think this should default to 0x00000000, then in the early_printk code
> we can test for zero baseaddress and attempt some sensible fallback in
> that case (even to disable).  

That's make sense to me.

>> +
>> +config HEART_BEAT
>> +	bool "Heart beat function for kernel"
>> +	help
>> +	  This option turns on/off heart beat kernel functionality on selected
>> +	  GPIO address.
>> +
>> +config HEART_BEAT_ADDRESS
>> +	hex "Physical address for heart beat LED"
>> +	depends on HEART_BEAT
>> +	default "0x40600000"
>> +	help
>> +	  Please enter physical address GPIO LED.
> 
> Again, default address should be zero which is checked in the code (zero
> can disable).  Prevent accesses to random memory locations in case of
> poorly configured kernel.

I'll add default option to HEART_BEAT to no and zero base address. I don't want to
add any checking code to this function except for #if solution.

>> +config HACK
>> +	bool "Increase performance"
>> +	default y
> 
> As suggested by Grant, this sohuld be
> 
> 1. renamed and described as something sensible
> 
> SELF_MODIFYING_CODE_HACK

:-) nice name

> 2. Made condition on CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL at very least.
> 
>> +config OPT_LIB_FUNCTION
>> +	bool "Optimalized lib function"
>> +	default y
>> +	help
>> +	  Allows turn on optimalized library function (memcpy and memmove).
>> +	  They are optimized by using unsigned alignment. This will work
> 
> "Unsigned alignment"??
> 
> Do you mean word-aligned?

Yes.

>> +	  fine if both source and destination are aligned on the same
>> +	  boundary. However, if they are aligned on different boundaries
>> +	  shifts will be necessary. This might result in bad performance
>> +	  on MicroBlaze systems without a barrel shifter.
>> +
>> +# This is still a bit broken - disabling for now JW 20070504
>> +config ALLOW_EDIT_AUTO
>> +	bool "Permit Display/edit of Kconfig.auto platform settings"
>> +	default n
>> +	help
>> +	  Allows the editing of auto-generated platform settings from
>> +	  the Kconfig.auto file. Obviously this does not change the
>> +	  underlying hardware, so be very careful if you go editing
>> +	  these settings.
>> +
>> +	  Also, if you enable this, and edit various Kconfig.auto
>> +	  settings, YOUR CHANGES WILL BE LOST if you then disable it
>> +	  again. You have been warned!
>> +
>> +	  If unsure, say no.
>> +
>> +# Ok, the platform is chosen. Source the kconfig.auto to get all of the
>> +# system settings.
> 
> Should be just "get all of the CPU settings", since we use OF to get the
> device tree.

OK.

>> diff --git a/arch/microblaze/platform/generic/Kconfig.auto b/arch/microblaze/platform/generic/Kconfig.auto
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..5dc8c15
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/arch/microblaze/platform/generic/Kconfig.auto
> 
>> +config XILINX_ERAM_SIZE
>> +	hex "Memory size of XILINX_RAM"
>> +	depends on XILINX_UNCACHED_SHADOW
>> +	default 0x02000000
> 
> Why does this depend on UNCACHED_SHADOW?

Because only UNCACHED_SHADOW wanted to know how big is memory. Current situation
is clear. Only consistent.c file wanted  UNCACHED_SHADOW choise. I'll remove
this choice too.

> Regards,
> 
> John

Thanks,
Michal
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/