Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next

[Stephen Rothwell]

On Mon, 5 May 2008 11:31:28 -0700 Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> So I'd suggest that you have a #for-next which contains material for 2.6.26
> and 2.6.27 and a #for-mm which contains material for 2.6.28+.
> 
> Only problem is, I'd need to generate the #for-next -> #for-mm diff, and
> that particular git operation has been troublesome in the past.

Yeah, it is fine if one is a subset of the other but otherwise fraught
with danger.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

Attachment: pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature