Re: [PATCH] bay: Exit if notify handler cannot be installed

From: Holger Macht
Date: Tue May 06 2008 - 13:15:29 EST


On Di 06. Mai - 12:39:01, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Tue, 06 May 2008, Alan Cox wrote:
> > On Tue, 6 May 2008 12:18:46 -0300
> > Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > On Tue, 06 May 2008, Shaohua Li wrote:
> > > > The bay driver is duplicated with libata, I thought we should delete it.
> > > > See bug http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9526
> > >
> > > The bay driver is currently useless, BUT it should handle a lot of stuff
> > > libata won't, such as bay batteries, bay floppies, and anything else in
> > > a bay that is not a hard disk.
> >
> > The bay driver needs to become a service that hands out bay events to
> > all the other drivers for that to happen.
>
> Seems sensible. Any pointers? I wouldn't know how to do it (and
> actually, right now I am busy working on rfkill for some stuff
> thinkpad-acpi needs), but I could try to tack bay after rfkill, if
> nobody beats me to it (hint!)
>
> BTW: dock handling might share these issues as well.

For pointers, the dock driver should be a good starting point. It already
handles this. For example, libata just calls
register_hotplug_dock_device(handle, callback) and gets notified.

Regards,
Holger

>
> The problem has a bit of a hard edge, though: if nobody binds to an ACPI
> node that has an EJ0 subnode, bay needs to do it. But if someone wants
> to, bay should give the node up, and somehow help that someone handle
> the ejection stuff.

dock does this:

acpi event --> dock calls all registered handlers from other drivers -->
--> dock executes _DCK

Regards,
Holger
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/