Re: Compact Flash Question

[Alan Cox]

> (1) Can you really ignore bit(2) (CORR) in the Status register offset 7 that 
> tells
> you that the CF has detected and corrected a soft error?, etc.

I guess it might be interesting to log the error rate but we don't
currently do that. A corrected error is just that however - corrected by
the card itself.

> (2) An engineer at SanDisk Engineering told me NOT to do wear leveling.
> The file allocation table is written very frequently back into the flash. So
> is it really safe to assume that I don't need wear leveling???

Depends on your hardware vendor. Wear management is done within the CF
card and only the hardware vendor can tell you what they do. 

> (3) Re. the BUSY bit in the status register (offset 7, bit D7), anybody 
> experienced
> time outs?

Yes - both from failing CF cards and also other random events (bad
connections, people removing live cards etc)

> (4) Re Error register (offset 1) bit D7 (BBK), again, I was told that it 
> cannot (???)
> happen since the CF performs read-after-write and it automatically switches 
> good blocks
> for bad ones... Is this correct?

Depends on your hardware vendor. It certainly *can* occur with some CF
cards perhaps when they run out of spare blocks.

Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/