Re: AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1
From: Linus Torvalds
Date: Wed May 07 2008 - 14:28:20 EST
On Wed, 7 May 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> [ this patch should in fact be a bit worse, because there's two more
> atomics in the fastpath - the fastpath atomics of the old semaphore
> code. ]
Well, it doesn't have the irq stuff, which is also pretty costly. Also, it
doesn't nest the accesses the same way (with the counts being *inside* the
spinlock and serialized against each other), so I'm not 100% sure you'd
get the same behaviour.
But yes, it certainly has the potential to show the same slowdown. But
it's not a very good patch, since not showing it doesn't really prove
much.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/