Re: Reverting per-cpuset "system" (IRQ affinity) patch

[Max Krasnyansky]

Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-05-06 at 22:52 -0500, Paul Jackson wrote:
>> Andrew wrote:
>>> Don't worry about it.  I sorted out things locally and I expect that
>>> Stephen will be able to as well.
>> Ok ...
>>
>> I hesitate more than I should some times to NAQ patches,
>> but the more I think about this one, the less willing I
>> am to have a per-cpuset file called "system".
>>
>> I'm not sure what "sorted out" means ... I'll wait and see.
>>
>> Thanks, Andrew.
>>
>> Sorry, Max, Peter and Ingo ... we really had not arrived at
>> agreement on this one.
> 
> No problem, I've been meaning to redo this whole series but somehow
> stuff got in the way and I never got around to it :-/

I'm actually totally surprised that it got in. Ingo applied Peter's initial
patch to his sched-devel tree but then ignored follow up patches with fixes
and stuff from me (I'm assuming that was  because we started discussion
alternative options).
Anyway, my vote goes for reverting these series.

Max
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/