Re: [PATCH 18/18] flag parameters: check magic constants

[Ulrich Drepper]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

David Miller wrote:
> You'll need to handle MIPS and PARISC as well, as they have
> similar conflicts.

Is MIPS really a problem?  The value is 0x80.  128 protocol types should
be enough.  Even if not, there is no reason why the numbers should be
consecutive.  It's easy enough to skip over a bit.  I.e., after procotol
0x7f the next one would be 0x100.

And PA seems to have gotten O_NONBLOCK wrong.  SPARC does it right AFAICS.

- --
â Ulrich Drepper â Red Hat, Inc. â 444 Castro St â Mountain View, CA â
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFIKRdJ2ijCOnn/RHQRAovKAKDFz2ZJ0E2XYVu5Qn8fME+ieZZopwCgmH4D
ldfvNrhK8LdvjZzNPViILV0=
=Z9Dj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/